Abstract

Neurotoxin receptor site 1, in the outer vestibule of the conducting pore of voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs), was first functionally defined by its ability to bind the guanidinium-containing agents, tetrodotoxin (TTX) and saxitoxin (STX). Subsequent studies showed that peptide μ-conotoxins competed for binding at site 1. All of these natural inhibitors block single sodium channels in an all-or-none manner on binding. With the discovery of an increasing variety of μ-conotoxins, and the synthesis of numerous derivatives, observed interactions between the channel and these different ligands have become more complex. Certain μ-conotoxin derivatives block single-channel currents partially, rather than completely, thus enabling the demonstration of interactions between the bound toxin and the channel’s voltage sensor. Most recently, the relatively small μ-conotoxin KIIIA (16 amino acids) and its variants have been shown to bind simultaneously with TTX and exhibit both synergistic and antagonistic interactions with TTX. These interactions raise new pharmacological possibilities and place new constraints on the possible structures of the bound complexes of VGSCs with these toxins.

Highlights

  • Tetrodotoxin (TTX) was the first pharmacological agent targeted to voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) that was characterized

  • Every compound believed to act at the same pharmacological site as tetrodotoxin is referred to as a ligand of neurotoxin receptor site 1

  • The prevailing view is that μ-conopeptides, being larger than tetrodotoxin, occupy a site that spatially overlaps the TTX binding site, but that amino acid residues in the ion channel vestibule further out from the mouth of the pore can contribute to binding of the peptide ligand, even though they do not interact with TTX

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tetrodotoxin (TTX) was the first pharmacological agent targeted to voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) that was characterized (see Narahashi [1] for a personal historical account). The prevailing view is that μ-conopeptides, being larger than tetrodotoxin, occupy a site that spatially overlaps the TTX binding site, but that amino acid residues in the ion channel vestibule further out from the mouth of the pore can contribute to binding of the peptide ligand, even though they do not interact with TTX. In this view, site 1 has two sub-sites: a core that can be occupied by a guanidinium toxin or a μ-conopeptide, and a more peripheral zone that interacts with the peptide, but not TTX or STX. Adapted from French et al, Neuron, 1996 [18]

Newly Discovered Complexities of Interactions between TTX and μ-Conopeptides
Potential Applications of Double Occupancy of Site 1
Syntoxins
Contratoxins
Recent Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call