Abstract

Recently, the issue of providing evidence in criminal proceedings has gained significant relevance. The outcome of a criminal case heavily relies on the accuracy and clarity with which evidence is presented. This article examines a specific type of evidence: the testimony of a suspect or accused, highlighting its unique features. Notably, the legal definition of the subject of such testimony is not explicitly outlined in the law. Furthermore, it is important to recognize that the legislative regulation of testimony differs from the procedural status of the individual being interrogated. Interestingly, the legislator assigns less legal weight to the confession of the accused compared to other forms of evidence. Three levels of the subject of proof in criminal cases were identified. In conclusion, it is emphasized that a clear distinction must be made between the content of testimony subject to proof in a criminal case and the information required to substantiate only the procedural circumstances of the case.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.