Abstract

Focal brain lesions can alter the morphology and function of remote brain areas. When the damage is inflicted more slowly, the functional compensation by and structural reshaping of these areas seem to be more effective. It remains unclear, however, whether the momentum of lesion development also modulates the functional network topology of the remote brain areas. In this study, we compared resting-state functional connectivity data of patients with a slowly growing low-grade glioma (LGG) with that of patients with a faster-growing high-grade glioma (HGG). Using graph theory, we examined whether the tumour growth velocity modulated the functional network topology of remote areas, more specifically of the hemisphere contralateral to the lesion. We observed that the contralesional network topology characteristics differed between patient groups. Based only on the connectivity of the hemisphere contralateral to the lesion, patients could be classified in the correct tumour-grade group with 70% accuracy. Additionally, LGG patients showed smaller contralesional intramodular connectivity, smaller contralesional ratio between intra- and intermodular connectivity, and larger contralesional intermodular connectivity than HGG patients. These results suggest that, in the hemisphere contralateral to the lesion, there is a lower capacity for local, specialized information processing coupled to a higher capacity for distributed information processing in LGG patients. These results underline the utility of a network perspective in evaluating effects of focal brain injury.

Highlights

  • Focal brain lesions can alter the morphology and function of brain regions remote from the area of structural damage [1, 2]

  • There was a significant difference in age between the two groups (independent samples t-test; t(78) = 4.66, p < 001): low-grade glioma (LGG) patients were significantly younger than high-grade glioma (HGG) patients, as is well-known from the literature (e.g., [71])

  • We examined network topology differences between LGG and HGG patients in the hemisphere contralateral to the lesion based on functional connectivity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Focal brain lesions (caused by, e.g., stroke or brain tumour) can alter the morphology and function of brain regions remote from the area of structural damage [1, 2]. Several studies have shown prominent functional changes, in patients compared to healthy subjects, in regions distant to the site of damage in situations where the damaged area is normally recruited [3,4,5]. These remote effects do not conform to a localizationist view but do fit a network perspective that focuses on connectivity and neural communication across regions. In several studies, changes in functional connectivity and changes in network organization after focal damage were found in the ipsilateral hemisphere and within the hemisphere contralateral to the lesion (e.g., [18,19,20,21]). This is in line with several modelling studies that showed that a virtual lesion can result in changes in functional connectivity and network topology, even of contralesional brain areas (e.g., [8, 22, 23])

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call