Abstract

BackgroundQuite a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been recently published. Therefore, an updated systematic review was performed to evaluate the temporal effect of PRP on knee pain and physical function.MethodsPubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Scopus were searched for human RCTs comparing the efficacy and/or safety of PRP infiltration with other intra-articular injections. A descriptive summary and quality assessment were performed for all the studies finally included for analysis. For studies reporting outcomes concerning Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) or adverse events, a random-effects model was used for data synthesis.ResultsFourteen RCTs comprising 1423 participants were included. The control included saline placebo, HA, ozone, and corticosteroids. The follow-up ranged from 12 weeks to 12 months. Risk of bias assessment showed that 4 studies were considered as moderate risk of bias and 10 as high risk of bias. Compared with control, PRP injections significantly reduced WOMAC pain subscores at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up (p = 0.02, 0.004, <0.001, respectively); PRP significantly improved WOMAC physical function subscores at 3, 6, and 12 months (p = 0.002, 0.01, <0.001, respectively); PRP also significantly improved total WOMAC scores at 3, 6 and 12 months (all p < 0.001); nonetheless, PRP did not significantly increased the risk of post-injection adverse events (RR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.80 to 2.45], I2 = 59%, p = 0.24).ConclusionsIntra-articular PRP injections probably are more efficacious in the treatment of knee OA in terms of pain relief and self-reported function improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up, compared with other injections, including saline placebo, HA, ozone, and corticosteroids.Review registrationPROSPERO CRD42016045410. Registered 8 August 2016.

Highlights

  • Quite a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been recently published

  • This systematic review included 14 RCTs and assessed the temporal effect of PRP on knee pain and physical function in the treatment of knee OA compared with other intra-articular injections, including saline, hyaluronic acid (HA), ozone, and corticosteroids

  • Previous systematic reviews concluded that PRP was an effective and safe alternative to treat knee OA, such conclusion was reached on the basis of less than 9 RCTs [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], and the temporal effect of PRP injections on knee pain and physical function was not fully investigated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quite a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been recently published. A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reported with favourable outcomes of PRP injections [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]; several reviews, including systematic reviews and meta-analysis, have been published with conclusion that PRP was found to be an effective and safe orthobiologic in the treatment of knee OA compared with other intra-articular injections [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. A large number of studies may allow us to fully investigate the temporal effect of PRP on knee pain and physical function

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call