Abstract

Agunah activism, a flagship struggle of Religious-Zionist feminism, links gender politics, Jewish-Orthodox politics, and national Israeli politics. This qualitative study focuses on agunah activists’ strategies and conceptions of change, highlighting the complex ways religious women radically transform conservative contexts, complicated by intersections of religion, gender, and state. It examines dynamic boundary-work and how activists deploy the inner workings of “the Halakhic framework” to shift creatively between social positioning, ideological or cultural positioning, and a political positioning to create “change from within”. My case study troubles the premise that religion and feminism are antithetical, and that distinct identities or set social locations predetermine social movements’ frames or actions. I expand upon the term “tempered radicals” which challenges reformist/revolutionary and conservative/radical binaries. “Tempered radical” strategies are two-pronged: a tempered mode of modulation and moderation to rock the boat without falling out (avoid the red lines, find “the right way”) and a radical mode of stirring the sea and creating horizons (arrive there, one way or another). Dynamically holding both modes together, through a “multifocal lens”—the world-as-it-is and the world-as-it-should-be—enables their strategic maneuverings. They remain “within” while radically transforming individuals, communities, Jewish law, Orthodox society and the Israeli public sphere. This study demonstrates how religious and gendered structures are at once constitutive and mutable.

Highlights

  • Religions 2021, 12, 628 morphing and diversifying

  • This paper delves into the boundary work involved in Religious-Zionist feminists’ strategies of change, as exemplified by women like Sophie who struggle for Jewish women’s right to divorce in Israel

  • The question at the heart of this paper is how Jewish-Orthodox feminists, Religious-Zionists engaged in highly political agunah activism in Israel, successfully promote change within their conservative tradition and communities while avoiding being silenced and ostracized

Read more

Summary

Agunah Activism as Flagship Struggle over Gendered Jewish-Orthodox Boundaries

In Israel, the agunah issue is further complicated by contentious entangelments between religion, gender, and (the Jewish) state, because Jews’ marriage and divorce is only adjudicated in the Israeli Rabbinic Court (IRC), a body controlled by (competing) Orthodox forces and empowered by the State.. Agunah activists confront gender boundaries as feminists of faith who step into the public sphere to voice critical opinions despite being socialized into modesty, piety, subordinance and domesticity. They challenge gendered boundaries by critiquing Jewish family law, as structured by “kiddushin” (lit., sanctity, Halakhic marriage and divorce) and/or as currently implemented in the IRC. It is crucial to critically analyze its strategies and unpack its “change from within” motto

Why “Within” Matters
What Does “Within” Mean?
Finding “The Right Way” and Avoiding Red Lines
A Multifocal Perspective
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.