Abstract
I argue that the approach suggested by The Taylor Review is flawed due to a conceptual reliance on a fuzzy understanding of control. When control is understood sociologically, it becomes apparent that it is a core feature of all labour relations and thus exists across employment statuses and takes various complex forms. Therefore, focusing labour law upon a fuzzy notion of control, might actually reduce existing levels of protection by causing the reclassification of workers who labour under subtle, insidious and intangible forms of control. Labour laws exist to recognise the vulnerable position of employees due to their livelihood being dependent on the person hiring them. This dependency exists regardless of the form control which an employer operates. Therefore, I argue that returning the law’s focus to dependency offers a sounder basis for determining employment classification and labour rights.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.