The Tasks at Hand: An Integrative Conceptual Review and Dimensional Scaling Framework

Abstract

Tasks are formative to what every working individual does, yet there is increasing ambiguity amid the disjointed state of the task literature which demands a much-needed state of clarification and way to categorize all types of tasks (Grant, 2007; Hackman, 1969; Hackman & Oldham, 1976; Wood, 1986). To rectify this issue, we conduct an integrated conceptual review of the differing task typologies and dimensions that have been explored. In doing so, we first provide a consensus on the definition of tasks and how it should be used in our field. Second, we develop an integrated dimensional scaling framework in which tasks can be categorized based on the three dimensions of task complexity, task significance, and task scope. Finally, we demonstrate how this framework can be applied and expanded upon in research and practice moving forward. Collectively, we hope this elicits debate and continued advancement in our field as we move forward in furthering our understanding of tasks.