Abstract
Tasks are formative to what every working individual does, yet there is increasing ambiguity amid the disjointed state of the task literature which demands a much-needed state of clarification and way to categorize all types of tasks (Grant, 2007; Hackman, 1969; Hackman & Oldham, 1976; Wood, 1986). To rectify this issue, we conduct an integrated conceptual review of the differing task typologies and dimensions that have been explored. In doing so, we first provide a consensus on the definition of tasks and how it should be used in our field. Second, we develop an integrated dimensional scaling framework in which tasks can be categorized based on the three dimensions of task complexity, task significance, and task scope. Finally, we demonstrate how this framework can be applied and expanded upon in research and practice moving forward. Collectively, we hope this elicits debate and continued advancement in our field as we move forward in furthering our understanding of tasks.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.