Abstract

This article presents a classifi cation of tamgas on petroglyphs and portable items. Tamgas are signs of group identity used by medieval Turkic nomads inhabiting Southern Siberia, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan. We describe eight groups of tamgas found in the Altai and in Semirechye, and compare them with similar signs from other parts of the region. The mapping of tamgas, including petroglyphic, sphragistic, and others allowed us to assess their date, ethno-political attribution, and migration routes of groups with which they were associated. The comparison of tamgas in the Altai and Semirechye evidences close links between those regions. Whereas certain groups of tamgas (combinations of many varieties) were emblems of major tribal unions, others were supratribal markers of social status, privileged clans, and alliances. Certain emblems were dynastic signs of the ruling elite. Dynastic tamgas of the Yaglakar clan are known from sites such as Syrnakh-Gozy and Kuray I in the Altai. Certain tamgas on coins and petroglyphs in Semirechye are emblems of the 8th and 9th century Karluk rulers of the Altai (Chagyn, Taldura, etc.) and central Mongolia (Shivet ulan). Two groups of tamgas (No. 1 and 3) have many derivatives, marking certain divisions of the Karluk federation. An example of a supratribal emblem is tamga No. 2, which shows little variation despite being found in various contexts across a vast territory.

Highlights

  • This article presents a classification of tamgas on petroglyphs and portable items

  • Tamgas are signs of group identity used by medieval Turkic nomads inhabiting Southern Siberia, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan

  • We describe eight groups of tamgas found in the Altai and in Semirechye, and compare them with similar signs from other parts of the region

Read more

Summary

ÝÏÎÕÀ ÏÀËÅÎÌÅÒÀËËÀ

Тамги кочевников тюркской эпохи на Алтае и в Семиречье (опыт сопоставления и идентификации). Такие знаки встречаются очень редко; они примечательны ввиду высокого политического статуса эмблемы, которая зафиксирована лишь на четырех мемориалах в Монголии и Китае (Бугут, Могойн Шине усу, Шивэт улан, эпитафия Кары Чортегина), на двух серебряных сосудах из Курай I и с о-ва Муруйский, а также как петроглиф в пунктах Сырнах-Гозы, Тепсей, Зурийн овоо, Хурийн узур К северо-востоку от Семиречья, на предполагаемой исходной территории расселения обладателей тамги No 1, омегообразные знаки-петроглифы неоднократно фиксировались на Алтае (Чаган, Уле, Цагаан-Салаа и Койбастау) [Кубарев В.Д., Цэвээндорж, Якобсон, 2005, прил. Обилие производных форм обоих знаков (тамги No 1 и 3) при неполном совпадении ареалов предполагает, по-видимому, существование многочисленных родственных подразделений, которые входили в два крупных самостоятельных объединения и занимали в близкое время (одновременно или последовательно) некоторые общие территории – первоначально высокогорья Алтая, затем западную часть Семиречья. Тамги No 1–3 в Семиречье следует датировать не ранее чем второй половиной VIII в., а скорее IX–X вв. и позднее

Тамга правящего клана карлуков
Список литературы
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.