Abstract

The article proposes a cognitive revision of sentence invariants with respect to the explication of main parts. Confusing `composition' and `structure' and bringing a morphological nomenclature of word classes to nominate invariants is a methodological problem. Extrapolation of terms from level to level adds contradiction to the categories and is a problem in the learning and acquisition of the language and its grammar. A cognitively correct sentence on this basis is one-component, subject or predicate, subject or predicate, but not one-component, because they are parts of the structure, not of the composition. The predicate sentence is always personal, but when it is expressed by a verb with a form in the third person only, i.e. in principle, there is no first and second position of the paradigm of this morphological category, it is subjectless.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call