Abstract

Purpose: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype with distinct heterogeneity, high invasiveness, and poorer prognosis. There is a controversy about adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) at the T1aN0M0 stage. This study was carried out to assess the survival benefit of ACT for these patients.Methods: We identified 1,099 patients with T1aN0M0 TNBC who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine factors related to survival. One-to-one (1:1) propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to construct a matched sample consisting of pairs of ACT and non-ACT subjects. Breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) of the two groups were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Stratified analysis according to different variables was also performed.Results: No obvious differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were found between patients who had ACT and those without ACT therapy in terms of race, marital status, laterality, or radiation therapy. A higher proportion of patients who were older, had a higher histological grade tumor, and who received breast-conserving surgery had adjuvant chemotherapy. The ACT group did not exhibit better survival in BCSS or OS before PSM. After PSM, the ACT and non-ACT groups consisted of 255 patients, respectively, and Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate analysis both indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with better survival in terms of BCSS or OS. Furthermore, we did not observe any survival advantage in any subgroup irrespective of age, race, marital status, histological grade, surgery type, or radiotherapy status.Conclusions: The study results indicate that there is no strong association between ACT and better survival in T1aN0M0 TNBC. It implies that the chemotherapy decision should be made cautiously and further research into therapeutic strategies are needed in T1aN0M0 TNBC patients.

Highlights

  • Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), which account for about 10–20% of breast cancer [1], are defined as tumors that lack the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) [2]

  • To explore the impact of ACT on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and Overall survival (OS) of T1aN0M0 TNBC, this study reviewed T1aN0M0 TNBC cases registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)

  • Our study discovered that T1aN0M0 TNBC patients with younger age or higher histological grade were more likely to receive ACT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), which account for about 10–20% of breast cancer [1], are defined as tumors that lack the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) [2]. They are characterized by higher invasiveness, heterogeneity, and a relatively poorer outcome than other subtypes [2,3,4]. The appropriate management and treatment of these TNBC patients has received significant attention in recent studies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call