Abstract
AimSurvival rates and prognostic factors of cortical ependymomas (CEs) remain elusive. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment, and outcomes for patients with CEs based on institutional and literature case series.Materials and MethodsThirty patients with CEs from our department were included in this study. Furthermore, a systemic review of the literature yielded an additional 106 patients with CEs. Clinical data including patient age, sex, symptoms, tumor location, World Health Organization (WHO) grade, extent of surgery, radiation, recurrence, and survival were recorded and statistically analyzed.ResultsFrom January 2009 to October 2019, 30 (4.2%) cases were diagnosed as CEs in our department. These series consisted of 19 males and 11 females, 10 continuous patients after 2017 screened for C11orf95-RELA fusion, and 9 patients (90%) were RELA fusion positive. During the follow-up period, nine (30%) patients depicted tumor recurrence or progression; four (13.3%) patients died of tumor progression. The literature review yielded 106 CE cases, with additional 30 cases of our own collected for further analysis. Of these 136 cases, the frontal lobe (40%) was the most common location, and the average age was 22.6 ± 17.6 years. Anaplastic histology/WHO grade III tumors were identified in 68 (50%) patients. Statistically analysis demonstrated that extent of surgery and WHO tumor grade were significant prognostic factors in Kaplan–Meier log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards models. Gross total resection (GTR) predicted longer progression-free survival (PFS) [P = 0.013, hazard ratio (HR) = 3.012, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.257–7.213] and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.003, HR = 5.322, 95% CI = 1.751–16.178). WHO grade III tumors had worse PFS (P = 0.002, HR = 5.17, 95% CI = 1.804–14.816) and OS (P = 0.025, HR = 5.640, 95% CI = 1.248–25.495).ConclusionCEs accounted for only 3.5 to 5.7% of ependymomas, with seizures the most common symptom and the frontal lobe the most frequent location. CEs may have higher rate of RELA fusions, but generally favorable prognosis. The extent of surgery and WHO tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. GTTR or WHO grade II tumors had better overall outcome in patients with CEs.
Highlights
Ependymomas are rare central nervous system tumors and account for 2 to 9% of all neuroepithelial tumors [1, 2]
Seventy-one (10%) cases were found in supratentorial extraventricular location, and 30 (4.2%) cases were diagnosed as Cortical ependymomas (CEs)
Based on volumetric analysis using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), gross total resection (GTR) was defined as complete resection of the tumor; subtotal resection was defined as any incomplete resection with less than 10% of tumor remnant; partial resection (PTR) was considered if the remnant tumor was larger than 10% of the initial tumor in volume
Summary
Ependymomas are rare central nervous system tumors and account for 2 to 9% of all neuroepithelial tumors [1, 2]. They predominantly involve the fourth ventricle and spinal cord [3, 4]. Cortical ependymomas (CEs) are such STEs that selectively involve cerebral cortex and have no relationship with the ventricular system [6,7,8]. Several previous studies have indicated that CEs are not a topographic description, but a new distinct subtype of STEs and should be classified separately from other types of ependymomas [5, 9,10,11]. To ensure the appropriately treatments are performed, it is necessary to further identify clinical features and prognostic factors of CEs
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
