Abstract
The electrical potentials at membrane surfaces (ψ0) strongly influence the physiological responses to ions. Ion activities at membrane surfaces may be computed from ψ0, and physiological responses to ions are better interpreted with surface activities than with bulk-phase activities. ψ0 influences the gating of ion channels and the driving force for ion fluxes across membranes. ψ0 may be computed with electrostatic models incorporating the intrinsic surface charge density of the membrane (σ0), the ion composition of the bathing medium, and ion binding to the membrane. Some of the parameter values needed for the models are well established: the equilibrium constants for ion binding were confirmed for several ions using multiple approaches, and a method is proposed for the computation of other binding constants. σ0 is less well established, although it has been estimated by several methods, including computation from the near-surface electrical potentials [zeta (ζ) potentials] measured by electrophoreses. Computation from ζ potentials yields values in the range –2 mC m−2 to –8 mC m−2, but other methods yield values in the range –15 mC m−2 to –40 mC m−2. A systematic discrepancy between measured and computed ζ potentials was noted. The preponderance of evidence supports the suitability of σ0= –30 mC m−2. A proposed, fully paramatized Gouy–Chapman–Stern model appears to be suitable for the interpretation of many plant responses to the ionic environment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.