Abstract
The Supreme Court's decision in two appeals relating to telecommunications licensing disputes and ‘Standard Essential Patents’, or ‘SEPs’, has profound implications for patent owners and implementers. It established that UK courts have the power to settle the terms of global licences for SEPs, and developed the meaning of the non-discrimination component of ‘FRAND’ (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) terms. However, these appeals leave unanswered a number of related questions – from the proper role of foreign courts to the drafting and practical operation of ‘adjustment’ clauses – that courts are likely to have to grapple with in future. This article summarizes the issues at stake in the two appeals, examines the arguments in the lower courts and the Supreme Court's reasoning, and looks ahead to the potential impacts of this long-awaited judgment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.