Abstract
stricted those powers specifically granted him by Constitution and laws? Or is he, in Theodore Roosevelt's words, the steward of people, obligated and entitled to do whatever needs of people demand, unless Constitution or laws explicitly forbid him do it? 1 Despite importance of these questions, there is, as late Mr. Justice Jackson pointed out, a poverty of really useful and unambiguous authority applicable concrete problems of executive power as they actually present themselves. 2 The steel dispute reached its culmination in early June of 1952 with Supreme Court's decision in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer. As most searching discussion of Presidential power in annals of Court, steel seizure case is a good point at which begin this analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
