Abstract

Microsaccades are small fixational eye movements that have shown to index covert attentional shifts. The present experiment combined microsaccades with performance measures from a dot-probe task to study influences of attachment security priming on the attentional biases of individuals high in attachment avoidance. Security priming is an experimental manipulation aimed at boosting felt security. Using a randomized, mixed design, we measured differences in attentional vigilance toward angry and neutral faces as a function of priming (neutral vs. secure) and attachment avoidance. Individuals high in avoidance habitually tend to withdraw from, or otherwise dismiss, emotionally salient stimuli. Here, we operationalized attentional withdrawal based on both task performance in the dot-probe task and microsaccadic movements. In addition, unlike previous studies where priming salience for the individual participant has been unclear, we used a standardized narrative method for attachment script assessment, securing an indication of how strongly each participant was primed. Dot-probe data significantly captured the link between avoidance and attentional disengagement, though from all facial stimuli (angry and neutral). Although microsaccadic movements did not capture avoidant attentional disengagement, they positively correlated to dot-probe data suggesting measurement convergence. Avoidance was associated with weaker security priming and no overall effect of priming on attention was found, indicating a need for further exploration of suitable priming methods to bypass avoidant deactivation. Our results provide a first indication that, as an implicit looking measure, microsaccadic movements can potentially reveal where early attention is directed at the exact moment of stimulus presentation.

Highlights

  • Cognitive Biases Associated With Attachment AvoidanceAttachment theory posits that early childhood experiences with caregivers result in internal working models that shape interpersonal relationships in adulthood (Bowlby, 1969)

  • We suggest that microsaccades may be more appropriate for assessing early, covert attentional biases

  • As it reflected percentage of microsaccades away from the stimulus, while positive values on the attentional orientation indexes (AOIs) indicate vigilance, the negative correlation means that the higher % microsaccades away from the stimulus, the more the AOI denoted disengagement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cognitive Biases Associated With Attachment AvoidanceAttachment theory posits that early childhood experiences with caregivers result in internal working models that shape interpersonal relationships in adulthood (Bowlby, 1969). Positive links have been shown between attachment security and adaptive coping, affect regulation and psychological resilience (Bartholomew and Horowitz, 1991; Mikulincer and Shaver, 2001), sophisticated executive functions, and academic performance (van IJzendoorn et al, 1995; Aviezer et al, 2002). Insecure attachment styles are construed as less adaptive and are linked to typical ways of processing emotional and relational information, distinctively different for attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety (Dykas and Cassidy, 2011). Since attachment avoidance is linked to several negative outcomes, e.g., loneliness, depression, anxiety (e.g., McWilliams and Bailey, 2010), and substance use disorder (e.g., Caspers et al, 2005), a better comprehension of the associated lower-level cognitive mechanisms is warranted

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call