Abstract
Objective To compare the effect and clinical value of endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection and endoscopic Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage.Methods 98 patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage were randomly divided into group A (48 cases) and group B (50 cases).Group A was treated with endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection,while group B was only treated with endoscopic Epinephrine injection.Results The hemostatic rate and the stop bleeding rate in group A were both 95.83％,without significant differences compared with group B (P ＞ 0.05).The rebleeding rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (6.25％ vs.22.00％,P ＜ 0.05).The emergency operation rates in group A and group B were 2.08％ and 8.00％ separately,without significant difference between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The hemostasis rate for Forrest Ⅰ a in group A was significant higher than that in group B (88.89％ vs.40.00％,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Endoscopic hemostatic metal clip combined with Epinephrine injection in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage can reduce rebleeding rate and improve hemostasis,which is a very safe and effective endoscopic hemostasis. Key words: Peptic ulcer; Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage; Hemostatic metal clip; Endoscopic injection
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
