Abstract

Recent research has used short questionnaires based on single item versions of psychosocial concepts to assess well-being. This has largely been confined to occupational samples and the present article describes the extension of this process to university students. The Student Well-being Process Questionnaire (Student WPQ) was used to examine predictors of positive well-being, negative mental health and cognitive function. An online survey was used with 478 first and second year undergraduates as participants. Regression analyses showed that positive well-being (e.g. happiness, positive affect and life satisfaction) was predicted by positive personality (high optimism, self-esteem and self-efficacy), high social support and low stressors and low negative coping scores. Negative outcomes (e.g. perceived stress, anxiety and depression) were predicted by high stressor, coping and conscientiousness scores, and low positive personality and social support scores. Cognitive problems were predicted by high stressor and negative coping scores and low positive personality scores. A MANOVA showed that there were no significant interactions between the predictor variables. The best predictor of all outcomes was a combined score including all predictor variables. Overall, the present study shows that the Student WPQ can provide useful information on predictors of different aspects of well-being. Future research can include additional potential predictors and other outcomes to determine whether other factors are significant when established predictors are adjusted for.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThese studies have been based on the Demands-Resources-Individual Effects model (DRIVE Model: Mark & Smith, 2008)

  • Regression analyses showed that positive well-being was predicted by positive personality, high social support and low stressors and low negative coping scores

  • Cognitive problems were predicted by high stressor and negative coping scores and low positive personality scores

Read more

Summary

Introduction

These studies have been based on the Demands-Resources-Individual Effects model (DRIVE Model: Mark & Smith, 2008). This model is flexible in that it allows for inclusion of new predictors and outcomes. Alongside workplace well-being, the well-being of university students has been studied for many years (Jones & Johnston, 1997) and high levels of depression, anxiety, and stress have been reported in undergraduate students (Bayram & Bilgel, 2008; Dahlin, Joneborg, & Runeson, 2005). Many of the same concepts in the WPQ, including demands, resources, coping style, and personality have been applied in this research

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call