Abstract
As the Duke of Argyll does not appear to have quite understood the meaning which I intended to convey in the paragraph of my review to which he refers, I should like to state that meaning a little more explicitly. This I should have done in the first instance had I not shared the feeling which he expresses, that “a purely scientific journal” is not an appropriate place in which to discuss the relations of science to theology, and I shall now hope to show that in my review I did not transgress the border of any such debatable ground.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
