Abstract
This article argues that the (Western-oriented) right to religion has been proven inadequate in protecting Indigenous Peoples’ rights. It recognizes that this is partly because of the distinctive characteristics of Indigenous religions, which differ from other dominant religions, but also because of the way in which religion has been used by colonialism with dramatic effects on Indigenous Peoples and their beliefs, spiritualities, and worldviews. The article focuses on Latin America to argue further that in addition to colonialism, the early Constitutions also attacked Indigenous religions. As Indigenous rights are more acknowledged in Latin America, we take this region as an excellent, albeit painful, example of how Indigenous religions have been pushed aside even in the most positive contexts. The article uses the constitutional and legal arrangements in Latin American states, mainly Ecuador and Bolivia, to critically assess the protection that these favorable to Indigenous Peoples legal systems’ guarantee to Indigenous rights despite a persistent implementation gap. Also, this article highlights the weaknesses of the international system in mitigating the manifold threats that Indigenous Peoples have to face on a daily basis in their struggle to maintain and transmit their religions and spirituality, including the assault of other religions and sects into their communities and the so-called neo-extractivism. The article finally draws some concluding remarks and recommendations on how to improve the freedom of and violations from religion(s) of Indigenous Peoples in the context of Latin America as well as international law more broadly.
Highlights
International human rights law is very clear that the right to religion has to be protected
This article argues that the (Western-oriented) right to religion has been proven inadequate in protecting Indigenous Peoples’ rights. It recognizes that this is partly because of the distinctive characteristics of Indigenous religions which differ from other dominant religions, but maintains that this is because of the way in which religion has been used by colonialism with dramatic effects on Indigenous Peoples and their beliefs, spiritualities, and worldviews
As the Indigenous Peoples did not know what happened to the remains of their deceased, the Court ordered Suriname to take all measures to recover promptly the remains of the Moiwana community members killed by the national army in 1986 (Inter-American Court of Human Rights 2005)
Summary
International human rights law is very clear that the right to religion has to be protected. This article argues that the (Western-oriented) right to religion has been proven inadequate in protecting Indigenous Peoples’ rights It recognizes that this is partly because of the distinctive characteristics of Indigenous religions which differ from other dominant religions, but maintains that this is because of the way in which religion has been used by colonialism with dramatic effects on Indigenous Peoples and their beliefs, spiritualities, and worldviews. The article discusses how law, in the form of the early Constitutions, annihilated Indigenous beliefs, spiritualities, and worldviews, making the contrast with the recent Constitutions of Ecuador and Bolivia and their protection of Indigenous Peoples and their rights. In this article, we use the terms Indigenous beliefs, spirituality(ies), worldviews, or even religions while taking into due consideration the abovementioned issues and ongoing discussions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.