The struggle is real: Theorising community justice restructuring agonistically

Jamie Buchan

doi:10.1177/2066220320927353

Abstract

This article is a novel use of the ‘agonistic framework’ – a theory of penal change developed in the US, which emphasises the role of hidden conflict – to analyse recent organisational reforms to probation in Scotland. It begins by drawing on recent empirical data to analyse the role of conflict between centralising and localist interests in driving these reforms. This is contrasted with a Scottish policy consensus over decarceration through diversion to community penalties, which despite broad support has been unsuccessful. To explain this contradictory situation, the article builds on recent agonistic literature on the exclusion of some conflicts from penal fields, adding new insights about the circumscription of smaller penal fields. It argues that together these factors serve to ‘crowd out’ debates necessary for substantive change. This new development of the agonistic framework helps explain Scotland’s lack of progress towards decarceration, with policy relevance for other smaller jurisdictions.

Highlights

This article develops contemporary theoretical work in the sociology of punishment by using the insights of the ‘agonistic framework’ (Goodman et al, 2015, 2017) to examine a recent set of probation governance reforms in Scotland
It advances the study of Scottish penal policy as it relates to community penalties, drawing on work by McNeill (2005, 2019a) as well as Morrison (2015) and Buchan and Morrison (2018)
In the first part of the article, I use the agonistic framework to sketch the contours of hidden conflict – between localist and centralising interests – in recent reforms to the system of Scottish community justice

Summary

Introduction

This article develops contemporary theoretical work in the sociology of punishment by using the insights of the ‘agonistic framework’ (Goodman et al, 2015, 2017) to examine a recent set of probation governance reforms in Scotland. In the first part of the article, I use the agonistic framework to sketch the contours of hidden conflict – between localist and centralising interests – in recent reforms to the system of Scottish community justice.

Results

Conclusion