Abstract
Basic structural properties of tail-biting trellises are investigated. We start with rigorous definitions of various types of minimality for tail-biting trellises. We then show that biproper and/or nonmergeable tail-biting trellises are not necessarily minimal, even though every minimal tail-biting trellis is biproper. Next, we introduce the notion of linear (or group) trellises and prove, by example, that a minimal tail-biting trellis for a binary linear code need not have any linearity properties whatsoever. We observe that a trellis - either tail-biting or conventional - is linear if and only if it factors into a product of elementary trellises. Using this result, we show how to construct, for any given linear code /spl Copf/, a tail-biting trellis that minimizes the product of state-space sizes among all possible linear tail-biting trellises. We also prove that every minimal linear tail-biting trellis for /spl Copf/ arises from a certain n/spl times/n characteristic matrix, and show how to compute this matrix in time O(n/sup 2/) from any basis for /spl Copf/. Furthermore, we devise a linear-programming algorithm that starts with the characteristic matrix and produces a linear tail-biting trellis for /spl Copf/; which minimizes the maximum state-space size. Finally, we consider a generalized product construction for tail-biting trellises, and use it to prove that a linear code /spl Copf/ and its dual /spl Copf//sup /spl perp///spl Copf//sup /spl perp///spl Copf//sup /spl perp///spl Copf//sup /spl perp// have the same state-complexity profiles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.