Abstract

course that (i,,(c))* is an integral domain. Finally, since (eS (c))* is a finite )dule over the complete local domain(,,()* and has no zero-divisors, it must a complete local domain.4 This completes the proof of our theorem. We shall conclude this note by a few remarks on the hypothesis of our theorem. observe that in our formulation of the local Theorem of Bertini, we have ;roduced the subring e and a system of regular parameters x,, ..., xt in , lile in the final assertion of the theorem only the three elements xi, x2, X3 enter ;o the picture. The question naturally arises whether it is necessary at all to ;roduce the regular local domain ( or even the system of parameters xl, ..., in t. As to the latter, one finds a measure of justification in the fact that, en in the equal-characteristic case where T9 contains a coefficient field k, an 9itrary set of three analytically independent elements xl, x2, X3 may generate an ideal of rank less than 3 and hence cannot be extended into a system of rameters in ?. This is a well-known situation where a local ring may contain as ;ubring a local ring of higher dimension, and one can easily obtain examples to ow that the local Theorem of Bertini cannot hold for an arbitrary set of three

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.