Abstract

AbstractConstitutive relations based on finite‐deformation‐valid analysis require the formulation of coupling effects that were not needed in earlier developments which included small deformation restrictions. However, the feasibility to introduce such coupling effects mathematically requires that the new terms introduced must be in accord with physically based concepts of the phenomena involved. An example came to light in which objectivity of a constitutive relation, considered to be generalized for finite deformation applications involving strain‐induced plastic anisotropy, had been achieved by use of the Jaumann derivative in place of the material derivative for the growth of a tensor variable which expressed the anisotropic characteristics. The spin terms thus added to the infinitesimal displacement analogue were not in accord with a physically based assessment of the underlying micro‐mechanical phenomena and in fact led to the prediction of anomalous stress response. This paper comprises comments on the subsequent development of the theory, including a tensor equation for the evolution of the anisotropy. By solving a sample test problem with different initial conditions both the numerical implementation of the constitutive relation and the response according to the proposed growth law of the anisotropy are described and discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call