Abstract
The required base shear and drift limit for post-disaster management buildings have increased in the Japanese Building Code following major seismic events. One method to satisfy these requirements for reinforced concrete frame buildings is to cast exterior non-structural concrete wall elements to be monolithic with frame elements, but without anchoring the longitudinal wall reinforcing. This provides additional stiffness and strength while limiting significant damage in the non-structural wall. In this study, the structural performances of such elements were evaluated using static and dynamic experimental tests. The result indicates that non-structural walls that were neither isolated by seismic slits nor anchored to the adjacent walls with longitudinal reinforcements experienced less damage and higher deformability compared with walls having seismic slits. The confinement reinforcing impact was not observed on the strength and drift capacity of the beam member, owing to the large number of transverse reinforcements. However, the confinements limited the damage and nearly prevented concrete crushing. The maximum horizontal load of the specimen could be predicted using cross-sectional analysis, and the authors propose a simple equation to predict it with sufficient accuracy.
Highlights
The wall members which are supposed to be non-load bearing components in a reinforced concrete building, are referred to as non-structural elements; their usage and design philosophy are changed following each significant earthquake
In practice, the seismic slit often appears as a result of monolithic casting of the non-structural wall with a frame which cannot completely isolate the non-structural wall
The objective of this study was to investigate the seismic performances of beams having non-structural spandrel walls without seismic slits
Summary
The wall members which are supposed to be non-load bearing components in a reinforced concrete building, are referred to as non-structural elements; their usage and design philosophy are changed following each significant earthquake. Damage observations of the reinforced concrete buildings after Great Hanshin earthquake in 1995 showed that the structural damage was minor compared to non-structural walls, which were reportedly significantly damaged [1]. Containing damage to the non-structural walls by avoiding stress transmission using seismic slits has been encouraged. The presence of a seismic slit between a non-structural wall and a primary frame restrains the stress transmission from the structural frame to non-structural walls to limit the damage [3]. In practice, the seismic slit often appears as a result of monolithic casting of the non-structural wall with a frame which cannot completely isolate the non-structural wall
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.