Abstract

Unnatural base pairs (UBPs) greatly increase the diversity of DNA and RNA, furthering their broad range of molecular biological and biotechnological approaches. Different candidates have been developed whereby alternative hydrogen‐bonding patterns and hydrophobic and packing interactions have turned out to be the most promising base‐pairing concepts to date. The key in many applications is the highly efficient and selective acceptance of artificial base pairs by DNA polymerases, which enables amplification of the modified DNA. In this Review, computational as well as experimental studies that were performed to characterize the pairing behavior of UBPs in free duplex DNA or bound to the active site of KlenTaq DNA polymerase are highlighted. The structural studies, on the one hand, elucidate how base pairs lacking hydrogen bonds are accepted by these enzymes and, on the other hand, highlight the influence of one or several consecutive UBPs on the structure of a DNA double helix. Understanding these concepts facilitates optimization of future UBPs for the manifold fields of applications.

Highlights

  • Introduction to Unnatural Base PairsGenetic information in all living organisms is encoded in DNA, which consists of nucleotides with four different nucleobases that form nucleobase pairs

  • The dP–dZ pair is based on an alternative hydrogen-bonding pattern compared with the natural base pairs dA–dT and dG–dC and adopts similar structures in free duplex DNA and the active site of KlenTaq DNA polymerase as the natural pairs

  • The fidelity of replication by DNA polymerases is still lower for dP–dZ than for the discussed hydrophobic unnatural base pairs (UBPs), mainly owing to the higher propensity for mispairing with natural nucleotides

Read more

Summary

Introduction to Unnatural Base Pairs

A 99.9 % selectivity in turn leads to 97 % retention of the UBP after 30 cycles of PCR (0.99930 = 0.97) and only 90 % retention after 100 cycles of PCR Even though this degree of selectivity is sufficient for a number of applications (e.g., in the use of primers containing UBPs in nested PCR or use in diagnostics),[13,14] for others, where high amplification of the DNA or plasmid containing the UBP is performed and loss of the UBP is critical (e.g., if implemented in an SSO that should produce proteins containing an unnatural amino acid),[9] a selectivity truly approaching that of natural pairs is crucial. DNA templates containing up to four consecutive dP–dZ pairs can be PCR amplified by Taq and Phusion DNA polymerases.[30]

Different UBPs and their Acceptance by DNA Polymerases
Hydrogen-bonding UBPs
Further artificial base pairs
Structure of Hydrophobic UBPs
Computational studies
Computational studies of structures within duplex DNA
NMR studies
Structure of UBPs in the active site of KlenTaq DNA polymerase
Binary complexes
Closed ternary complexes
Partially closed ternary complexes
Post-chemistry extension complexes
Proposed mechanism of replication for hydrophobic UBPs and its consequences
Structure of Hydrogen-Bonding UBPs
Structure in free duplex DNA
Structure in KlenTaq DNA polymerase
Comparison of Different UBP Candidates
Processing by DNA polymerases
Structure in the active site of KlenTaq
Structure in duplex DNA
Summary and Conclusions
Conflict of interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call