Abstract

Patients frequently attribute symptoms and distress to their workplace. Such workplaces are characterized as “stressful,” “hostile,” or “toxic.” Such phrases cannot serve as a substitute for clinical assessment of the patient's work problem. Proper assessment entails understanding the situation at the workplace and the patient's reaction to the situation. This article discusses several ways in which legal and psychiatric frameworks used to assess workplace problems can be mutually incompatible. Poor clinical and functional outcomes, such as chronic anxiety or depressive symptoms, separation from the workplace facilitated by prolonged claims of work incapacity, long-term unemployment, and patient involvement in protracted litigation, can occur in the absence of informed and proactive clinical engagement. This article identifies steps to consider when a patient presents with work complaints. Active and skillful engagement with patients who present with a workplace problem not only mitigates negative clinical and functional outcomes but also promotes the psychological, social, and economic well-being of the patient. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2021;51(2):70–75.]

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.