Abstract

The geometry of Re2Cl82− has been optimized for the eclipsed (D4h) equilibrium conformation and for the staggered (D4d) conformation at BP86/TZ2P. The nature of the Re–Re bond which has a formal bond order four has been studied with an energy decomposition analysis (EDA). The EDA investigation indicates that the contribution of the b2 (δxy) orbitals to the Re–Re bond in the \(^1A_{1g} (\delta^2\delta^{*^{0}})\) ground state is negligibly small. The vertical excitation of one and two electrons from the bonding δ orbital into the antibonding δ* orbitals yielding the singly and doubly excited states \(^1A_{1g} (\delta^1\delta^{*^{1}})\) and \(^1A_{1g}(\delta^0\delta^{*^{2}})\) gives a destabilization of 17.5 and 36.1 kcal/mol, respectively, which is nearly the same as the total excitation energies. The preference for the D4h geometry with eclipsing Re–Cl bonds is explained in terms of hyperconjugation rather than δ bonding. This is supported by the calculation of the triply bonded Re2Cl8 which also has an eclipsed energy minimum structure. The calculations also suggest that the Re–Re triple bond in Re2Cl8 is stronger than the Re–Re quadruple bond in Re2Cl82−. A negligible contribution of the δ orbital to the metal–metal bond strength is also calculated for Os2Cl8 which is isoelectronic with Re2Cl82−.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.