Abstract
The effects of source materials on the microstructure and mechanical properties were studied by comparing two types of geopolymers synthesized from metakaolin, a non-waste material, and the admixture of two wastes, red mud and fly ash. Unconfined compression testing was conducted to assess their curing time and mechanical properties, while X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy employed to examine geopolymerization reactions and the composition and microstructure of the end products. For a given Si/Al ratio, the metakaolin-derived geopolymer exhibits higher compressive strength than the waste-based one. Both geopolymers contain a significant amount of voids and unreacted phases as inactive fillers within the geopolymer binder, resulting in complexity and variability in their mechanical behavior. The difference in strength and microstructure between the two geopolymers is attributed to the different reactivity of source materials, percentage of nonreactive fillers, and alkalinity for geopolymerization reactions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
