Abstract

The spectral model of Perryet al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 165, 1986, pp. 163–199) predicts that the integral length scale varies very slowly with distance to the wall in the intermediate layer. The only way for the integral length scale’s variation to be more realistic while keeping with the Townsend–Perry attached eddy spectrum is to add a new wavenumber range to the model at wavenumbers smaller than that spectrum. This necessary addition can also account for the high-Reynolds-number outer peak of the turbulent kinetic energy in the intermediate layer. An analytic expression is obtained for this outer peak in agreement with extremely high-Reynolds-number data by Hultmarket al. (Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 108, 2012, 094501;J. Fluid Mech., vol. 728, 2013, pp. 376–395). Townsend’s (The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flows, 1976, Cambridge University Press) production–dissipation balance and the finding of Dallaset al. (Phys. Rev. E, vol. 80, 2009, 046306) that, in the intermediate layer, the eddy turnover time scales with skin friction velocity and distance to the wall implies that the logarithmic derivative of the mean flow has an outer peak at the same location as the turbulent kinetic energy. This is seen in the data of Hultmarket al. (Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 108, 2012, 094501;J. Fluid Mech., vol. 728, 2013, pp. 376–395). The same approach also predicts that the logarithmic derivative of the mean flow has a logarithmic decay at distances to the wall larger than the position of the outer peak. This qualitative prediction is also supported by the aforementioned data.

Highlights

  • (1976) developed his well-known attached-eddy model to predict the profile with distance from the wall of the turbulent kinetic energy

  • Streamwise turbulence intensity in turbulent pipe flow in the intermediate range where the wall distance is much larger than the wall unit δν and much smaller than, say, the pipe radius δ

  • In this intermediate range the turbulent kinetic energy scales with the square of the wall friction velocity uτ and decreases logarithmically with distance to the wall

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Considering turbulent pipe/channel and turbulent boundary layer flows, Townsend (1976) developed his well-known attached-eddy model to predict the profile with distance from the wall of the turbulent kinetic energy. Superpipe (Morrison et al 2004; Hultmark et al 2012, 2013) show that an outer peak appears in the mean square fluctuating streamwise velocity at distances from the wall between about 100δν and 800δν when the turbulent Reynolds number Reτ = δ/δν is larger than about 20 000. This order of cross-over wavenumbers is important in the spectral interpretation given by Perry et al (1986) of Townsend’s attached eddy hypothesis

The Townsend–Perry attached eddy model
A modified Townsend–Perry attached eddy model
Intermittent attached eddies
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.