Abstract

We introduce a Bayesian method to infer repeated-game strategies that best describe individuals' observed actions. We apply this method to buyer behavior in posted-offer market experiments. While the strategies of one-quarter of the buyers in our experiments correspond to the game-theoretic prediction of passive price-taking, for three-quarters of the buyers we infer different, non-trivial, repeated-game strategies that condition on time, price, and combinations of the two variables. The strategies are generally effective: the use of strategies and their complexity correlate negatively with market prices and monopolist profits. One strategy is particularly effective: the unconditional and intense forgoing of profitable purchases early in the game is more effective as a counteracting response to monopoly power than punishments that trigger when the market price exceeds a threshold. We propose that strategy inference should at least complement existing methods of statistical inference on observed strategic behavior.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.