Abstract

Meaning-making in the brain has become one of the most intensely discussed topics in cognitive science. Traditional theories on cognition that emphasize abstract symbol manipulations often face a dead end: The symbol grounding problem. The embodiment idea tries to overcome this barrier by assuming that the mind is grounded in sensorimotor experiences. A recent surge in behavioral and brain-imaging studies has therefore focused on the role of the motor cortex in language processing. Concrete, action-related words have received convincing evidence to rely on sensorimotor activation. concepts, however, still pose a distinct challenge for embodied theories on cognition. Fully embodied abstraction mechanisms were formulated but sensorimotor activation alone seems unlikely to close the explanatory gap. In this respect, the idea of integration areas, such as convergence zones or the ‘hub and spoke’ model, do not only appear like the most promising candidates to account for the discrepancies between concrete and abstract concepts but could also help to unite the field of cognitive science again. The current review identifies milestones in cognitive science research and recent achievements that highlight fundamental challenges, key questions and directions for future research.

Highlights

  • Cedric Galetzka*Reviewed by: Carlos Herrera, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Spain Guido Gainotti, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Italy

  • Where do words get their meaning from? This so-called grounding problem is at the core of the current theoretical debate within the cognitive sciences

  • As a result, disembodied theories seem unlikely to be able to offer a full account of semantic processing (Meteyard et al, 2012) Abstract concepts, have divided the field of embodied cognition

Read more

Summary

Cedric Galetzka*

Reviewed by: Carlos Herrera, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Spain Guido Gainotti, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Italy. Meaning-making in the brain has become one of the most intensely discussed topics in cognitive science. Still pose a distinct challenge for embodied theories on cognition. Embodied abstraction mechanisms were formulated but sensorimotor activation alone seems unlikely to close the explanatory gap. In this respect, the idea of integration areas, such as convergence zones or the ‘hub and spoke’ model, do appear like the most promising candidates to account for the discrepancies between concrete and abstract concepts but could help to unite the field of cognitive science again. The current review identifies milestones in cognitive science research and recent achievements that highlight fundamental challenges, key questions and directions for future research

INTRODUCTION
SENSORIMOTOR COMPONENTS OF CONCEPT KNOWLEDGE
THE NEED FOR INTEGRATION AREAS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call