Abstract

The article focuses on how people living on basic income benefits position street-level bureaucrats in their speech. The research material consists of 15 unstructured interviews gathered mainly in Association for unemployed. Analysis is done in the context of positioning theory. Participants always have moral positions in discussion and with these positions they have different rights and duties to say certain things. Interviewees’ speech and especially the word choice reflect on known story-line and interviewees’ position in it. There is always a new story-line for each shift in interviewees taken or given position. Basic income recipients position street-level bureaucrats as inadequate, disciplining and unpredictable. I interpret that these given positions enable a shift of autonomy from recipients to street-level bureaucrats. Hence the given positioning reflects the story-line of victimhood.

Highlights

  • Sari MäkiReceived December 3rd, 2012; revised January 10th, 2013; accepted January 22nd, 2013

  • Like the above excerpt reveals people living on a basic income benefits consider the situation differently

  • To form a larger view on the matter requires it to listen to people who know what it is like to live on a basic income benefits

Read more

Summary

Sari Mäki

Received December 3rd, 2012; revised January 10th, 2013; accepted January 22nd, 2013. The article focuses on how people living on basic income benefits position street-level bureaucrats in their speech. The research material consists of 15 unstructured interviews gathered mainly in association for unemployed. Analysis is done in the context of positioning theory. Participants always have moral positions in discussion and with these positions they have different rights and duties to say certain things. Interviewees’ speech and especially the word choice reflect on known story-line and interviewees’ position in it. There is always a new story-line for each shift in interviewees taken or given position. Basic income recipients position street-level bureaucrats as inadequate, disciplining and unpredictable. I interpret that these given positions enable a shift of autonomy from recipients to street-level bureaucrats. The given positioning reflects the story-line of victimhood

Introduction
Public Support of Basic Income Security Recipients
Research Material and Analysis
Child home care allowance Higher education study grant and housing supplement
Inadequacy of the level of basic income is associated with
Disciplining Procedures
Unpredictable Advice
Victims of the Welfare State?
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.