The STING in the tale of Teflon®: Delayed ureteric obstruction after subureteric transurethral injection with polytetrafluoroethylene paste for vesicoureteral reflux

Abstract

Introduction“Subureteric Teflon INGection” (STING) of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE/polytef) paste to treat vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children was popularised in 1984. It was later abandoned as an implantation material because of the possibility of migration from the injection site. Giant-cell foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder is a rare cause of ureteric obstruction. Only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature. MethodsWe performed a prospective analysis of a series of 6 adult patients who had childhood STING and presented with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder. We report their clinical presentation, findings and treatment. Results1 male and 5 females with a history of STING procedure in childhood for VUR presented in later life with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef. The median age at first STING procedure and at presentation to the Urology Department was 3 and 34 years respectively. The most common clinical presentations were flank pain and urinary tract infection (UTI) and all patients had radiological findings of calcified lesions at the vesicoureteric junction(s). 4 patients had histological findings of giant-cell foreign-body granuloma. 4 patients required definitive ureteric reimplantation. ConclusionPolytef granuloma causing distal ureteric obstruction may give rise to significant morbidity and renal damage. Due to the likelihood of progression of the granuloma, excision and ureteric reimplantation is considered the standard approach in the management of patients with viable kidneys. Level of evidenceLevel 5.