Abstract

BackgroundThe German national nosocomial infection surveillance system, KISS, has a component for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (called NEO-KISS) which changed from a system with voluntary participation and confidential data feedback to a system with mandatory participation and confidential feedback.MethodsIn order to compare voluntary and mandatory surveillance data, two groups were defined by the surveillance start date. Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) parameters and infection rates of the NICUs in both groups were compared. In order to analyze the surveillance effect on primary bloodstream infection rates (BSI), all VLBW infants within the first three years of participation in both groups were considered. The adjusted effect measures for the year of participation were calculated.ResultsAn increase from 49 NICUs participating in 2005 to 152 in 2006 was observed after the introduction of mandatory participation. A total of 4280 VLBW infants was included in this analysis. Healthcare-associated incidence densities rates were similar in both groups. Using multivariate analysis with the endpoint primary BSI rate and comparing the first and third year of participation lead to an adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.78 (CI95 0.66-0.93) for old (voluntary) and 0.81 (CI95 0.68-0.97) for new (mandatory) participants.ConclusionsThe step from a voluntary to a mandatory HCAI surveillance system alone may lead to substantial improvements on a countrywide scale.

Highlights

  • The German national nosocomial infection surveillance system, KISS, has a component for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants which changed from a system with voluntary participation and confidential data feedback to a system with mandatory participation and confidential feedback

  • Benchmarking of healthcare associated infections (HCAI) surveillance data has been used for many years in many countries to inform preventive strategies and reduce infection rates

  • Most national surveillance systems were started on a voluntary basis and with confidential data feedback to the participating hospitals, but due to huge media and patient interest, mandatory participation and public reporting of HCAI have been implemented in many countries

Read more

Summary

Methods

In order to compare voluntary and mandatory surveillance data, two groups were defined by the surveillance start date. Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) parameters and infection rates of the NICUs in both groups were compared. In order to analyze the surveillance effect on primary bloodstream infection rates (BSI), all VLBW infants within the first three years of participation in both groups were considered. The detailed surveillance method used in NEO-KISS is described elsewhere [1], [2]. It can be found under www.nrz-hygiene.de/en/ surveillance/hospital-infection-surveillance-system/neokiss/ together with the latest reference data. Surveillance persons from each neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have to attend an introductory course before starting data collection where the definitions are explained and trained with case studies

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call