Abstract
In this paper, the A. discuss a number of problems he had with the interpretation of Old English to in to-infinitives as described by Taro Kageyama. The main part of his argument will be to show that the presence (or absence) of to does make a difference semantically. For this purpose, he will look at a number of constructions in which both to and zero infinitives occur, shows how they differ, and how this can be stated in syntactic terms
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
