Abstract
This article looks at the significance of a recent trio of High Court decisions for the status of the principle established in Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW). The Kable principle as it has come to be understood will be outlined and also why it has attracted criticism and generated controversy in some quarters. The analysis undertaken will demonstrate that the High Court has secured its status in Australian constitutional law. It will however be suggested that the more significant legacy of the Kable principle after these cases is to secure a fuller integration of the Australian judicial system and outline what this may entail for the operation of constitutional doctrine, in particular the emerging due process principle.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
