Abstract

The comparison of inflammatory markers in different age groups of patients with endogenous depression and correlation of immunological parameters with the clinical features of depression. The study included 140 patients with endogenous depression (ED) (F21, F31-F34, ICD-10) aged 15 to 82 years (39.8±23 years), including 55 patients of adolescent age (18.9±2.8 years), 30 middle-aged patients (38.7±10.3 years) and 55 elderly patients (69.1±7.1 years). The total duration of the disease differed from 5 months to 45 years. Psychometric assessment of patients was carried out using HDRS. The control groups consisted of 143 healthy people aged 16 to 75 years. The activity of inflammatory markers leukocyte elastase (LE) and α1-proteinase inhibitor (α1-PI), their ratio (leukocyte-inhibitory index, LII), the levels of antibodies to S100B and myelin basic protein (MBP) were determined in blood. Three immunological clusters were identified that correspond to different clinical variants of ED. A pro-inflammatory status with an activation of the leukocyte-inhibitory system is characteristic of 52.9% of patients (cluster 1). The clinical feature of this status is predominantly «classic» ED in the form of anxious, anxious-melancholic or anxious-apathetic depression without pronounced negative symptoms. Two other clusters are characterized by the imbalance of leukocyte-inhibitory system associated with insufficient a1-PI activity (cluster 2) and with insufficient LE activity (cluster 3). A common clinical feature of such ED is an atypical course with the predominance of apathetic-adynamic and dysphoric depression, the presence of negative disorders and a poor prognosis. The imbalance of leukocyte-inhibitory system associated with insufficient LE activity is typical mainly for elderly patients and is characterized by a longer duration of disease. The status of leukocyte-inhibitory system of inflammation is correlated with the clinical features of ED in different age groups of patients. LII can be considered as an additional paraclinical criterion for differential diagnosis and prognosis of ED.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call