The standard for the management of male urethral strictures in the UK: a consensus document

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to establish an evidence-based best clinical practice consensus for the management of urethral stricture disease in the UK. Methods: A systematic review of optimal management of urethral stricture generated a base document which was endorsed by the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) section of Andrology and Genito-Urinary Reconstructive Surgeons (AGUS). A two-round electronic mail modified Delphi survey of 43 consultant reconstructive urologists, members of the British Association of Genito-Urinary Reconstructive Surgeons (BAGURS), was then performed. The panel’s views about the base document was sought in seven domains: definition, diagnosis, investigation, conservative, endoscopic and reconstructive treatments, and follow up. Responses were collated and used to modify the base to achieve a consensus statement. Results: In round one of the Delphi process four panel members commented on the base document and seven in round two. Consensus was thereby reached on 38 statements regarding definition (one), diagnosis (three), investigation (two), conservative/endoscopic (five) and reconstructive (24) treatments and follow up (three) for the management of urethral stricture disease. Conclusion: This consensus statement will help standardise care, provide guidance on the management of urethral stricture disease, and assist in clinical decision-making for healthcare professionals of all grades.