Abstract
The paper examines the challenges that encounter the negotiation process over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). The project would make a huge contribution to Ethiopia’s economic development and energy demand, though Egypt and Sudan are concerned and seek a binding agreement on the dam’s filling and operation. The dam has become a source of contention between Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan. To de-escalate the intensity and reach a final and comprehensive deal, the three countries have negotiated multiple times, though it usually ends in disagreement. Position, colonial era agreements, securitizing, and internationalizing the GERD have been obstructing the negotiation. The article suggests that since distributive negotiation neither benefits Ethiopia nor Egypt and Sudan, the talks should be concluded with integrative ends. The parties should also have political will and commitment to make the GERD a plat form for cooperation rather than conflict. Received: 13 March 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
