The stability enigma of hydraulic vulnerability curves: addressing the link between hydraulic conductivity and drought-induced embolism.

Abstract

Maintaining xylem water transport under drought is vital for plants, but xylem failure does occur when drought-induced embolisms form and progressively spread through the xylem. The hydraulic method is widely considered the gold standard to quantify drought-induced xylem embolism. The method determines hydraulic conductivity (Kh) in cut branch samples, dehydrated to specific drought levels, by pushing water through them. The technique is widely considered for its reliable Kh measurements, but there is some uncertainty in the literature over how to define stable Kh and how that relates to the degree of xylem embolism formation. Therefore, the most common setup for this method was extended to measure four parameters: (i) inlet Kh, (ii) outlet Kh, (iii) radial flow from xylem to surrounding living tissue and (iv) the pressure difference across the sample. From a strictly theoretical viewpoint, hydraulic steady state, where inflow equals outflow and radial flow is zero, will result in stable Kh. Application of the setup to Malus domestica Borkh. branches showed that achieving hydraulic steady state takes considerable time (up to 300min) and that time to reach steady state increased with declining xylem water potentials. During each experimental run, Kh and xylem water potentials dynamically increased, which was supported by X-ray computed microtomography visualizations of embolism refilling under both high- (8kPa) and low-pressure (2kPa) heads. Supplying pressurized water can hence cause artificial refilling of vessels, which makes it difficult to achieve a truly stable Kh in partially embolized xylem.