Abstract
Though there is a large body of literature and research on sponsorship of sports events, it seems that previous research on firm sponsorship of sports events has narrowly focused on sponsorship from a customer perspective. Consequently, research on sponsorship from a firm perspective is lacking. Specifically, it seems that no study has investigated and identified the main factors that motivate the sponsorship of sports events. This article begins with exploring firms’ motives for sponsorship found in the literature, and identifies two fundamental pairs of contrastive orientations related to sponsorship motives: internal versus external motives and opportunistic versus altruistic motives. Next, we combine the four fundamental motivational orientations into a two-way matrix that constitutes a framework for categorising firms’ motivations for sponsoring sports events. We also explore and elaborate the framework more fully in a qualitative study. On the basis of empirical findings, we identify four general or ideal types of motivational categories that reflect the combination of firms’ fundamental and contrastive orientations related to sponsorship motives. The main or ideal types of sponsorship motivational categories are labelled “market”, “society”, “bond” and “clan”. The final framework, displaying firms’ four main categories or ideal types of sponsorship motives, is referred to as the Sponsorship Motive Matrix (SMM). We conclude with suggestions for future research and a discussion of the implications that can be drawn from the SMM framework.
Highlights
Sponsorship is one of the most rapidly growing areas of modern marketing (Delia and Armstrong, 2015)
As the goal was to acquire an indepth understanding of motives for sponsoring sports events, we found that it was best to let the informants communicate in their own terms and manner as much as possible (Silverman, 2000)
Most informants pointed to several motives for sponsoring an sport event
Summary
Sponsorship is one of the most rapidly growing areas of modern marketing (Delia and Armstrong, 2015). One important reason for this growth in sponsorship RESEARCH PAPER. Seems to be that traditional marketing channels such as television, radio and magazine advertisements are becoming less effective than others, including sponsorship. An increasing number of firms see sponsorship as a natural and important part of their marketing mix. Sponsorship for some firms constitutes the largest proportion of their total budget for marketing communication. In Norway, sponsorship has become the thirdlargest communication channel (Thjømøe, 2010). In line with this, Alexandris et al (2012) state that sponsorship may be a more effective communication strategy than traditional advertising. Sponsorship is a powerful medium for communicating and forming relationships with a specific target group (Bowdin et al, 2011; Collett and Fenton, 2011)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
