Abstract
While autoimmune antibodies or autoantibodies have been reported sporadically in adult patients with idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis (IPH), their true prevalence is unknown. The question as to whether any difference exists between antibody-positive and negative patients has not been explored. The primary objective of this paper was to assess the spectrum of autoantibody testing and its positivity rate. The other objectives included a comparative analysis of demographics, symptom onset, clinical manifestations, and differences in clinical outcomes between antibody-positive (cohort A) and negative (cohort B) patients. To that end, we conducted a retrospective review of the relevant published literature. Multiple databases were searched to retrieve studies published between 1990 and 2022.A total of 35 studies, involving 38 patients, were identified. Five of these patients had a positive autoantibody. Patients in cohort A were older and more likely to be male. The frequencies of testing for these antibodies were as follows: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA): 37/38 (97.4%), antinuclear antibody (ANA): 31/38 (81.6%), and anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody (anti-GBM): 30/38 (78.9%); 5/38 (13.2%) patients tested positive for an autoantibody, and two of these patients were positive for ANA, two for antithyroid antibody, and one patient tested positive for ANCA, rheumatoid factor (RF), and granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibody. There was no difference between the cohorts regarding their clinical presentations, recurrence risks, and survival.The occurrence of autoantibodies is uncommon in adult IPH patients. This is in contrast with the pediatric IPH patient population, where the prevalence is much higher (26.4% vs. 13.2%), and the antibodies are more diverse. Unlike pediatric patients, adult patients with autoantibodies do not necessarily have worse outcomes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have