Abstract

In some recent papers (called $\mathcal{S}$-functional calculus) for n-tuples of both bounded and unbounded not-necessarily commuting operators. The $\mathcal{S}$-functional calculus is based on the notion of $\mathcal{S}$-spectrum, which naturally arises from the definition of the $\mathcal{S}$-resolvent operator for n-tuples of operators. The $\mathcal{S}$-resolvent operator plays the same role as the usual resolvent operator for the Riesz–Dunford functional calculus, which is associated to a complex operator acting on a Banach space. When one considers commuting operators (bounded or unbounded) there is the possibility of simplifying the computation of the $\mathcal{S}$-spectrum. In fact, in this case we can use the F-spectrum, which is easier to compute than the $\mathcal{S}$-spectrum. In the case of commuting operators, our functional calculus is based on the $\mathcal{F}$-spectrum and will be called $\mathcal{SC}$-functional calculus. We point out that for a correct definition of the $\mathcal{S}$-resolvent operator and of the $\mathcal{SC}$-resolvent operator in the unbounded case we have to face different extension problems. Another reason for a more detailed study of the $\mathcal{F}$-spectrum is that it is related to the $\mathcal{F}$-functional calculus which is based on the integral version of the Fueter mapping theorem. This functional calculus is associated to monogenic functions constructed by starting from slice monogenic functions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call