Abstract

Organisms are faced with the challenge of making inferences about the physical world from incomplete incoming sensory information. One strategy to combat ambiguity in this process is to combine new information with prior experiences. We investigated the strategy of combining these information sources in color vision. Single cones in human subjects were stimulated and the associated percepts were recorded. Subjects rated each flash for brightness, hue, and saturation. Brightness ratings were proportional to stimulus intensity. Saturation was independent of intensity, but varied between cones. Hue, in contrast, was assigned in a stereotyped manner that was predicted by cone type. These experiments revealed that, near the fovea, long and middle wavelength sensitive cones produce sensations that can be reliably distinguished on the basis of hue, but not saturation or brightness. Taken together, these observations implicate the high-resolution, color-opponent parvocellular pathway in this low-level visual task.

Highlights

  • Incoming sensory information is inherently noisy and ambiguous

  • The results revealed that subjects used color terms in a stereotypical manner predicted by cone type, but largely independent of stimulus intensity

  • The neural computation of color depends on both relative activity across the three cone types and previous experience (Gegenfurtner, 2003; Brainard, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Incoming sensory information is inherently noisy and ambiguous. Investigating the rules through which incoming sensory signals are combined with prior evidence is an important area of brain research (Knill & Pouget, 2004). We studied the color appearance of light targeted to a single receptor in order to elucidate the rules the visual system follows when presented with impoverished information from its primary sensory neurons. Understanding these rules will provide insight into how the visual system handles uncertainty in more naturalistic tasks as well

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call