Abstract
The essay examines the complex links between literature and the political. Specifically, it offers a comparative analysis of three twentieth-century forms of conceptualizing the relationship: an author-focused model (Benjamin), an artwork-centered model (Adorno), and, finally, a paradigm where literature is conceived as an institution (Althusser). Both the advantages and the limits of these models are carefully assessed. What they share is the impact of the Marxist tradition and the centrality of the state as the defining moment of the political. These older models are contrasted then with two more recent discourse-oriented models (Mouffe and Benhabib) that in different ways open up the possibility of an active role of literature within a democratic community, yet without stressing the weight of state power.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
