Abstract

Standing upright on stable and unstable surfaces requires postural control. Postural control declines as humans age, presenting greater risk of fall-related injury and other negative health outcomes. Secondary cognitive tasks can further impact balance, which highlights the importance of coordination between cognitive and motor processes. Past research indicates that this coordination relies on executive function (EF; the ability to control, maintain, and flexibly direct attention to achieve goals), which coincidentally declines as humans age. This suggests that secondary cognitive tasks requiring EF may exert a greater influence on balance compared to non-EF secondary tasks, and this interaction could be exaggerated among older adults. In the current study, we had younger and older adults complete two Surface Stability conditions (standing upright on stable vs. unstable surfaces) under varying Cognitive Load; participants completed EF (Shifting, Inhibiting, Updating) and non-EF (Processing Speed) secondary cognitive tasks on tablets, as well as a single task control scenario with no secondary cognitive task. Our primary balance measure of interest was sway area, which was measured with an array of wearable inertial measurement unit sensors. Replicating prior work, we found a main effect of Surface Stability with less sway on stable surfaces compared to unstable surfaces, and we found an interaction between Age and Surface Stability with older adults exhibiting significantly greater sway selectively on unstable surfaces compared to younger adults. New findings revealed a main effect of Cognitive Load on sway, with the single task condition having significantly less sway than two of the EF conditions (Updating and Shifting) and the non-EF condition (Processing Speed). We also found an interaction of Cognitive Load and Surface Stability on postural control, where Surface Stability impacted sway the most for the single task and two of the executive function conditions (Inhibition and Shifting). Interestingly, Age did not interact with Cognitive Load, suggesting that both age groups were equally impacted by secondary cognitive tasks, regardless the presence or type of secondary cognitive task. Taken together, these patterns suggest that cognitive demands vary in their impact on posture control across stable vs. unstable surfaces, and that EF involvement may not be the driving mechanism explaining cognitive-motor dual-task interference on balance.

Highlights

  • Research over the past several decades has found that standing upright involves multiple levels of controlled and automatic processing to integrate multiple streams of information (Peterka, 2002; Boisgontier et al, 2013)

  • For the postural sway data, we ran a 5 (Cognitive Load: Baseline vs. non-executive function (EF) processing speed vs. EF shifting vs. EF updating vs. EF inhibition) × 2 (Surface Stability: firm vs. foam) × 2 (Age: younger vs. older) mixed model ANOVA

  • We found a main effect of Cognitive Load [F(4, 280) = 3.89, p = 0.004, η2p = 0.05]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research over the past several decades has found that standing upright involves multiple levels of controlled and automatic processing to integrate multiple streams of information (Peterka, 2002; Boisgontier et al, 2013). One finds evidence for this in studies that require participants to maintain balance while performing cognitive tasks, which leads to impaired postural control (Lajoie et al, 1993; Andersson et al, 2002; Huxhold et al, 2006). This cognitivemotor interaction may be due to limitations in how humans use higher-order cognitive processing to manage the coordination of multiple tasks. If task performance costs come from information-processing bottlenecks, we expect to see general interference regardless the specific tasks; if the costs come from limited attentional resources, we expect to see greater interference for tasks that require similar attentional resources

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call