Abstract

BackgroundOrgan procurement organizations coordinate organ donation through 2 distinct models of care: the conventional model, in which donors are managed at hospitals where brain death occurs, and the specialized donor care facility (SDCF) model, where brain dead donors are transferred to a freestanding facility. The aim of this study is to compare operating room efficiency for procurements between the SDCF and conventional models of care. MethodsWe performed a prospective analysis of operating room efficiency between thoracic donor procurement operations performed at a SDCF and other organ procurement organizations using the conventional model of care. Key domains of efficiency were chosen based on a literature review and expert panel consensus. Data were collected in real time over a 12-month period via direct observation and personnel interviews. ResultsBetween January 1 and December 31, 2018, data were obtained from 54 procurement operations (n = 17 SDCF; n = 37 conventional). Donors in the 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Procurements at the SDCF were performed with fewer nonsurgeon team members (2 vs 4, P < .001) without any difference in the organ yield. SDCF procurements more closely adhered to planned start times (6 vs 61 minute difference, P < .001), and a trend was observed for SDCF-based procurements to facilitate daytime transplant operations. ConclusionsThe SDCF model of donor care outperforms the conventional model in several important measures of operating room efficiency. These differences are likely to result in cost savings and improved healthcare provider satisfaction in the highly effort- and resource-intensive landscape of organ transplantation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call