Abstract

John Gower’s version of the rape of Lucretia in the Confessio Amantis begins with an episode in which the rapist, Arrons, injures himself as a deceptive ploy. Gower’s depiction of this episode, often omitted from other medieval accounts of Lucretia, complements his description of Lucrece’s inarticulate explanations and highly visible suffering to emphasize the rhetorical impact of pain. In the present moment, this tale evokes the political power of the rape narrative, but it also suggests the potential for manipulation or the further victimization of survivors if these narratives are misread. In this article, then, I propose a reconsideration of Gower’s use of the confessional mode as a means of recontextualizing rape narratives within the Confessio and developing a politics of listening. Through careful reading of confession’s successes and failures in the text, audiences might cultivate new ways of understanding and productively responding to these stories.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.