Abstract
It is generally taken for granted that the structure of physical space is relational in character. Objects in physical space have their spatial location solely in virtue of the spatial relations they bear to other objects. This view is usually contrasted with substantival theories which view space as a kind of substance whose existence, as well as certain structural features, are in no way dependent on the objects which occupy it at any particular time.' Given the prevalence of the relational view of physical space, it is natural to suppose that perceptual space has a similar structure. Hence, most philosophers take for granted that perceptual objects have their location in the visual field in virtue of their spatial relations to other objects in the field. This claim, however, has been disputed. Bertrand Russell and Nelson Goodman have both argued that the spatial structure of the visual field is not relational in character. What is particularly striking about their view is that they do not adopt a substantival view of perceptual space but hold, instead, that objects in the visual field have their location by virtue of monadic positional properties. Russell characterizes his theory in the following manner:
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.