Abstract

The phenomenon of the Spanish Conquest of the Maya region suggests strongly that, in the process of socio-cultural transformation, ‘religion’ has no meaning as a concept with its own particular dynamic. There is no such thing as ‘religious’ change that is not also tied to other sorts of changes and indeed to continuity. One dramatic change was the adoption by whole communities, or large segments of communities, of Christian burial practice in which the body was placed in the supine position, head to the west, facing east. Christian burial is seen to represent ‘religious conversion’ but it was one of a broad sweep of changes in how power was gained and wealth appropriated, and the way in which killing was socially sanctioned through warfare. Evidence is accumulating from sites in Belize that a significant change in burial practice also took place at time of the Maya collapse in the ninth and tenth centuries. The question that remains to be answered is whether or not the new interment practices were part of a pattern which, like the burials of the Conquest period, reflected broader socio-cultural transformations.

Highlights

  • The theme of the papers in this volume is archaeology’s contribution to the study of religious change; a main sticking point regarding the theme is whether or not we can identify change that is ‘religious’ without being something else

  • What is ‘religion’? Why does it retain such a powerful hold on us as a descriptive or even explanatory concept, when strong arguments can be made that the concept as we use it contributes instead to fragmentation (Lambek 2000)? We address the first question because the outcome guides inquiry into the material manifestations of the Spanish Conquest and the changes that took place at the time of the Maya collapse

  • According to the Spanish/European worldview of the time, warriors killed warriors on the battlefield; according to the Maya/Mesoamerican worldview of the time, priests killed captured warriors in temples, there is evidence from the Contact period to suggest that rulers, not priests, were the decision-makers in cases in which the life or death of a war captive was concerned (Scholes and Roys 1938: 607)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The theme of the papers in this volume is archaeology’s contribution to the study of religious change; a main sticking point regarding the theme is whether or not we can identify change that is ‘religious’ without being something else. Maya; Spanish Conquest; Christianity; burial practices; religion; Classic Maya collapse.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.